<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meaningful use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adambosworth.net/2009/06/18/meaningful-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adambosworth.net/2009/06/18/meaningful-use/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on health, technology, and sometimes politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: u20868</title>
		<link>http://adambosworth.net/2009/06/18/meaningful-use/#comment-5056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[u20868]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adambosworth.net/?p=131#comment-5056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is good information, much appreciated.,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is good information, much appreciated.,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://adambosworth.net/2009/06/18/meaningful-use/#comment-5011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oscar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adambosworth.net/?p=131#comment-5011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meaningful Use is great, and like you said, this is something to be happy about. Making information available when needed is critical, and even more so for patient care data. I like the five key points you mentioned, these should keep things in track. 

One of the big challenges that meaningful use participants face is the integration with others and the ability to properly share that clinical information to make it all happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meaningful Use is great, and like you said, this is something to be happy about. Making information available when needed is critical, and even more so for patient care data. I like the five key points you mentioned, these should keep things in track. </p>
<p>One of the big challenges that meaningful use participants face is the integration with others and the ability to properly share that clinical information to make it all happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Seidman</title>
		<link>http://adambosworth.net/2009/06/18/meaningful-use/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Seidman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adambosworth.net/?p=131#comment-4671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More background on how the meaningful use progress has been made can be found at http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/714, where you can read about the work of the Consumer Partnership for eHealth.  

Some additional suggestions for how to improve the patient-centered nature of the draft definition issues by ONC (for more detail see http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/718):
    * Certainly, some of the elements should be moved up — earlier in the timeline (e.g., secure messaging, patient access to self-management tools &amp; decision support, and electronic reporting on experience of care).
    * The access to electronic information needs to be “timely” (a word that should be added); timely applies both to the speed at which it is made available and the ability to get information targeted to the consumer’s particular moment in care.
    * Incorporation of data generated by the consumers themselves beyond just what can be uploaded from electronic monitoring devices (per the 2013 criterion).
    * There should be more attention to consumer information tools (beyond just narrowly definted personal health records) and more clarity around the kinds of tools that consumers need — not just self-management tools but also decision support tools and tools that facilitate effective &amp; efficient communication to improve the infrastructure for participatory medicine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More background on how the meaningful use progress has been made can be found at <a href="http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/714" rel="nofollow">http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/714</a>, where you can read about the work of the Consumer Partnership for eHealth.  </p>
<p>Some additional suggestions for how to improve the patient-centered nature of the draft definition issues by ONC (for more detail see <a href="http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/718" rel="nofollow">http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/718</a>):<br />
    * Certainly, some of the elements should be moved up — earlier in the timeline (e.g., secure messaging, patient access to self-management tools &amp; decision support, and electronic reporting on experience of care).<br />
    * The access to electronic information needs to be “timely” (a word that should be added); timely applies both to the speed at which it is made available and the ability to get information targeted to the consumer’s particular moment in care.<br />
    * Incorporation of data generated by the consumers themselves beyond just what can be uploaded from electronic monitoring devices (per the 2013 criterion).<br />
    * There should be more attention to consumer information tools (beyond just narrowly definted personal health records) and more clarity around the kinds of tools that consumers need — not just self-management tools but also decision support tools and tools that facilitate effective &amp; efficient communication to improve the infrastructure for participatory medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
